Vietname War Opposition

You are an opponent of American involvement in Vietnam. Use the evidence in this chapter to begin formulating ideas to make a poster or a leaflet putting forward your views. You will work on this in class on Friday. You can include stories and images from pages 353-61. However, you must also include an explanation that will convince the supporters of containment that the policy is not working in Vietnam. OPTIONAL: Instead of opposing the war, you can support it. Feel free to make a COUNTER-ARGUMENT that the war is necessary to contain Communism.
1. Note all of the reasons why you feel the war in Vietnam is wrong.
American soldiers are embarassing our country. They kill innocent civilians, like they were opposed to during World War II and now they are doing it themselves. It is costing our country money to murder innocent civilians. Our soldiers do not know how to handle these tactics.
2. Note what you re trying to achieve with this poster. (e.g. to convince people to write to their Congressmen to get the troops out.)
Trying to achieve that peopel should not support the war and help protest it so Congressmen and the govenment will bring back our troops.
3. List possible images for your poster. Think about: background (e.g. destroyed villages); the central image (e.g. picture of a young soldier); whether you will need words to explain your image.
pictures: American soldiers burning down houses and villages with childrena dn mothers ruinnign and screaming.
backround: sad vietnamese children
4. List some possible slogans for your poster.
Stop the war before we turn communist!
Our soldiers have had enough!

vietnam war turning points

The assignment is due by 3:10 on Wednesday.
1. Why was the Tet Offensive a turning point? Explain your answer.
The Tet Offensive was a turning point because the Americans beat the Viet Cong and wekaened the Viet Cong's forces. When the Viet Cong tried to take over the American embassey the Americans fought room by room. Also the communists did not support the Viet Cong when they needed it.
2. Are Sources 51 and 52 making the same point about the My Lai Massacre?
Source 51 says that the American soldiers didn't go there to kill people and they felt that that was the only reason they were there. Source 52 was saying that they weren't there to kill people they were there to destroy communism and had to ikill people to do that.

3. Why do you think it took 12 months for anyone to do anything about the massacre?
I think it took 12 months for anyone to do anyhting about the massacre because the word hadn't spread and people were to afraid to bring it up in case someone would get mad. The soldiers were also fighting and had to get back before they could tell aNyone. The government wanted to hide the facts so Americans wouldn't be anti war.
4. Why was the massacre so shocking to the American public?
The massacre was shocking because people didn;t think Americans were like that and couldn't beliveve that their soldiers had steeped so low that the country used to be against. Americans had no idea what was happening until this was uincovered.

The U.S. struggles against the Communist in Vietnam

Step 2: Using pages 356-61 in the Vietnam War Reading, make notes in columns 2 (US Army) and 4 (Viet Cong) to record how far each side had each quality.Stage 2: Thinking it throughStep 3: in each row of column 3, draw some scales to show which way the balance falls for this quality. Did the USA or the Viet Cong have the advantage?Now think about the overall picture - how the strengths and weaknesses work together.


1a) Were the armies finely balanced or was the balance strongly weighted to one side or the other?
The armies were finely balanced. As the Viet COng had effective tactics and support from the population, the allies and Soth Vietnamese had more people and technology.
1b) Which quality was most important in determining who won the war? Was one feature so important that being ahead in that area meant that other advantages or disadvantages did not matter?

In determining who won the war effective tactics was the most important quality. The South Vietnamese and its allies outnumbered the Viet Cong greatly, but the Viet Cong had suchgood tatcics that they were able to defend themselves. All of the options matter in the end but not nearly as much as effective tactics.

Stage 3: Explaining your conclusionsThe failure of the U.S. army to beat the Communist in Vietnam was the result of its own weaknesses and Viet Cong strengths.





2. Now write up your answer. Use this structure:


a. The U.S. weaknesses were:
They did not know how to react from the guerilla tactics, and they were not supported by their own country.

b. At the same time, the Communist strengths were:
Effective tactics, underground systems/ booby traps, support from civilians

c. The U.S. forces did have some successes. For example the
La Dreng Valley, Tet Offensive

d. However, there were some major failures as well. Examples of these were:
killing many innocent civilians, no support from civilians, often walked into traps

e. The Viet Cong had some major successes, such as:
underground tunneles, fought enemies off even though they were largely outnumbered

f. However, they also suffered defeats, for example:
Tet Offensive, La Dreng Valley,

g. If I had to identify one major American weakness, it would be not getting support from their country because this really effected the war. Many Americans were against the ar and had learned that AMerican soldiers were killig innocent Vietnamese civilaians and were upset by this. If they had the support from their country then more people would have joined and backed up the war instead of being anti-war.


h. The key Viet Cong strength was guerilla war tactics because the Americans were thrown off by these tactics. they had not been familiar with these tactics and often fell into booby traps and had to fight hard even though they outnumbered the Americans. There tactics also made the Americans look bad in their homelands which was a Viet Cong advantage.